Lucky imaging

We have a telescope on the roof of the physics building. It's a fairly nice fourteen-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope, though in fairly rough shape. Unfortunately, the physics building (and necessarily the telescope) is in the middle of downtown Montreal, which is a terrible place to look at the sky: bright lights, clouds, urban heat island, et cetera. So we have a telescope that collects lots of light but doesn't produce very sharp images. My attempt to work around this is described below.


Recently a group of us went up on the roof and looked through it. It was a cloudy night, but we were able to look at the Moon and Jupiter. Looking at Jupiter we could see weather bands and the four Galilean satellites. The Moon was really very bright, so I tried pointing my little digicam through the eyepiece. It did a reasonably credible job, enough that I can show what the seeing is like:
As I hope you can see, the seeing varies greatly from moment to moment. Major ground-based telescopes deal with this by placing a deformable mirror in the light path, and driving it in such a way that the image stays stable and sharp. This is called adaptive optics, and it's a major area of research. (For example: how do you tell what you need to do to stay in focus? If there's a bright star, you can keep its image sharp, but if not you have to try to do something with a "laser guide star".)

At an amateur level, though, there is a trick that can help deal with bad seeing. It's called "lucky imaging", and looking at the video, it should be pretty clear how it can work: just take a video, throw out all the frames that are blurry, line up the ones that are left, and add them together to beat down the noise. Again you need a bright star (or something) in the frame to do the selection and alignment.

In this particular case, the Moon is so bright I don't need to stack multiple images, so I just ran a Laplacian filter over each frame and selected the one with the highest RMS value. Which is how I got the image at the top of the page.

3 comments:

Stefan van der Walt said...

It's a pity the seeing causes such localized distortion, otherwise it might have been easier to apply registration + super-resolution.

Are there any characteristics of the seeing that could be used to remove it with, e.g., deconvolution?

Stefan van der Walt said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anne Archibald said...

There are tricks like that that can be done in the image analysis domain. But it's a challenge to even take images this quickly without getting swamped by per-image noise - even with a big telescope you get photons trickling in. And with a big telescope you tend to be averaging over many cells, so all-good images are even rarer.

The best approach to dealing with this is called "adaptive optics", where you use "wavefront sensors" to map the optical distortion produced by the atmosphere, and deformable mirrors to reverse it. This is apparently a real pain to keep working, but when it does it can really clear up the image. It turns out that if you can combine this with lucky imaging, you can do even better.

There was an error in this gadget